AIRI-Wine industry standard · 26 July 2026 · 7 min
AIRI-Wine Italy: Antinori outshines everything — the rest stay below their worth
The 20 largest Italian wineries in the benchmark: Antinori in 56% of answers, but the lowest AIRI average of all five countries (51/100).

Photo: Pexels
Italy is the country of one great exception: Marchesi Antinori appears in 56% of all answers — the highest single figure in the entire series. After that the curve drops steeply: Gaja (31%), Tenuta San Guido (28%), and from sixth place onwards almost the whole field sits below 20%.
At the same time Italy sits in the lower half on AIRI (63/100) and has the second weakest freshness figure after France (60/100). And one finding no other country shows this sharply: 9% of Italian wineries actively lock AI crawlers out — in Switzerland and Germany it is 1% each. The exception is Ferrari Trento at 86/100 — technically the best wine website in Italy, yet present in only 14% of answers. The potential is documented; it has not been realised.
The ranking
The first two columns show the outcome — how often AI names the estate. The last two show the website side — how well AI systems can read it. The two measurements are independent and often diverge; that divergence is the finding.
| # | Winery | AI visibility | Mentions | AIRI | AIRI rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marchesi Antinori | 56% | 20/36 | 55/100 | Moderate |
| 2 | Gaja | 31% | 11/36 | 27/100 | Poor |
| 3 | Tenuta San Guido | 28% | 10/36 | 45/100 | Moderate |
| 4 | Masi Agricola | 25% | 9/36 | 57/100 | Moderate |
| 5 | Donnafugata | 22% | 8/36 | 86/100 | Excellent |
| 6 | Frescobaldi | 19% | 7/36 | 53/100 | Moderate |
| 7 | Castello Banfi | 19% | 7/36 | 66/100 | Good |
| 8 | Fontanafredda | 19% | 7/36 | 1/100 | Critical |
| 9 | Marchesi di Barolo | 19% | 7/36 | 1/100 | Critical |
| 10 | Ornellaia | 19% | 7/36 | 57/100 | Moderate |
| 11 | Zonin1821 | 17% | 6/36 | 1/100 | Critical |
| 12 | Ferrari Trento | 14% | 5/36 | 86/100 | Excellent |
| 13 | Planeta | 11% | 4/36 | 73/100 | Good |
| 14 | Tasca d’Almerita | 8% | 3/36 | 51/100 | Moderate |
| 15 | Barone Ricasoli | 6% | 2/36 | 60/100 | Good |
| 16 | Santa Margherita | 6% | 2/36 | 83/100 | Excellent |
| 17 | Tommasi | 6% | 2/36 | 2/100 | Critical |
| 18 | Mastroberardino | 6% | 2/36 | 66/100 | Good |
| 19 | Ruffino | 3% | 1/36 | 70/100 | Good |
| 20 | Michele Chiarlo | 0% | 0/36 | 75/100 | Good |
AIRI rating by score: Excellent from 80, Good 60–79, Moderate 40–59, Poor 20–39, Critical below 20.
What the AIRI dimensions show
| AIRI dimension | Panel avg. |
|---|---|
| LLM instructions (llms.txt) | 19/100 |
| Structured data | 41/100 |
| Freshness | 60/100 |
| Content quality | 72/100 |
| Technical basis | 74/100 |
| AI crawler access (robots.txt) | 78/100 |
| Crawlability | 79/100 |
| Brand clarity | 82/100 |
One caveat for precision: the panel estate Michele Chiarlo was not named in a single answer — the only Italian winery in that position. And the Ferrari Trento case shows the limit of a purely technical approach: an excellent web presence guarantees no recommendations as long as the content does not answer the questions customers actually put to AI systems.
Where does your winery stand?
We measure your AI visibility with the same method — free, with real answers as evidence and your country’s industry average for comparison.
Request the free report (worth CHF 20)