AIRI-Wine industry standard · 26 July 2026 · 6 min

Wineries vs. cantonal banks: two industries, the same AI gap

The AIRI comparison with Swiss finance shows banks are only a few points ahead of wineries — and both industries fail on the same two dimensions.

Facade of the Swiss National Bank in Zurich

Photo: Pexels

Since 2026 Operal has also measured Swiss finance against the AIRI standard — most recently all 24 cantonal banks (operal.tech, March 2026). That allows a comparison which holds a mirror up to both industries: how machine readable are the 20 largest Swiss wineries next to the 24 cantonal banks?

Wineries CH (top 20)Cantonal banks (24)
Avg. AIRI score67/10068/100
Best resultRobert Gilliard (88)St.Galler Kantonalbank (90)
LLM instructions (llms.txt)29/10048/100
Structured data39/10043/100
Brand clarity85/10090/100
MeasuredJuly 2026March 2026

The gap is smaller than one would expect: four AIRI points separate an industry with billion-franc balance sheets and its own digital teams from family businesses in wine. And both fail on the same two dimensions — llms.txt and structured data. At the time of measurement not a single cantonal bank had implemented an llms.txt; among Swiss wineries it looks barely different.

In fairness: the visibility of the two industries is not directly comparable — banking customers ask different questions than wine buyers, and the question catalogues differ accordingly. What is comparable is the AIRI score, because it measures the same eight website-side dimensions against the same specification (github.com/operalag/airi-spec).

The lesson for the wine industry: there is no structural handicap. The gap to Switzerland’s most professional digital industry is four points — and the two weakest dimensions are exactly the ones a machine-readable twin closes in weeks.

Where does your winery stand?

We measure your AI visibility with the same method — free, with real answers as evidence and your country’s industry average for comparison.

Request the free report (worth CHF 20)