AIRI-Wine industry standard · 16 August 2026 · 7 min
Champagne: 60 wineries measured — 56 are never named by AI
A complete regional measurement: all 60 wineries of Champagne. Most visible estate Champagne Bollinger at 36%, regional average 1% — every figure from 36 AI answers stored word for word.

Photo: Pexels
Until now we measured countries: the 20 largest estates in Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Italy and France. That is a reference point, not a peer group — a twelve-hectare family estate stands there next to Antinori. This measurement does it differently for the first time: one whole region, completely. All 60 wineries of Champagne, asked the questions wine buyers actually ask about the region.
Of 60 estates, 4 are ever named at all — 56 appear in none of the 36 answers. Champagne Bollinger leads on 36%.
The ranking
The first two columns show the outcome — how often AI names the estate. The last two show the website side — how well AI systems can read it. The two measurements are independent and often diverge; that divergence is the finding.
| # | Winery | AI visibility | Mentions | AIRI | AIRI rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Champagne Bollinger | 36% | 13/36 | 52/100 | Moderate |
| 2 | Champagne Philipponnat | 14% | 5/36 | 78/100 | Good |
| 3 | Champagne G.H. Martel | 3% | 1/36 | 50/100 | Moderate |
| 4 | Champagne Vincent Couche | 3% | 1/36 | 56/100 | Moderate |
| 5 | CHAMPAGNEUX | 0% | 0/36 | 1/100 | Critical |
| 6 | Champagne Smej Vely | 0% | 0/36 | 70/100 | Good |
| 7 | Champagne J. Charpentier | 0% | 0/36 | 67/100 | Good |
| 8 | Champagne Vallois François | 0% | 0/36 | 46/100 | Moderate |
| 9 | Champagne Philippe Martin | 0% | 0/36 | 52/100 | Moderate |
| 10 | Justin Maillard | 0% | 0/36 | 83/100 | Excellent |
| 11 | Champagne JP Gaudinat | 0% | 0/36 | 88/100 | Excellent |
| 12 | Champagne Francis Orban | 0% | 0/36 | 65/100 | Good |
| 13 | Champagne Pierre Gilbert | 0% | 0/36 | 49/100 | Moderate |
| 14 | Champagne François Lecompte | 0% | 0/36 | 53/100 | Moderate |
| 15 | Champagne L&S Cheurlin | 0% | 0/36 | 57/100 | Moderate |
| 16 | CHAMPAGNE A.MARGAINE | 0% | 0/36 | 85/100 | Excellent |
| 17 | Champagne Stéphane Herbert | 0% | 0/36 | 53/100 | Moderate |
| 18 | Champagne Lacuisse | 0% | 0/36 | 66/100 | Good |
| 19 | Bonnaire & Clouet | 0% | 0/36 | 59/100 | Moderate |
| 20 | Leroy Galland | 0% | 0/36 | 64/100 | Good |
| 21 | Champagne Alain Depoivre | 0% | 0/36 | 59/100 | Moderate |
| 22 | Champagne Montaudon | 0% | 0/36 | 1/100 | Critical |
| 23 | Champagne Pierre Paillard | 0% | 0/36 | 73/100 | Good |
| 24 | EARL Chevreau | 0% | 0/36 | 68/100 | Good |
| 25 | Champagne Albans d’Aulbe | 0% | 0/36 | 63/100 | Good |
| 26 | Champagne Grand Cru | 0% | 0/36 | 55/100 | Moderate |
| 27 | Champagne Vaucelle | 0% | 0/36 | 70/100 | Good |
| 28 | Champagne Apollonis | 0% | 0/36 | 51/100 | Moderate |
| 29 | Champagne Chapuy | 0% | 0/36 | 53/100 | Moderate |
| 30 | Champagne Guy de Forez | 0% | 0/36 | 83/100 | Excellent |
| 31 | Champagne Lancelot | 0% | 0/36 | 49/100 | Moderate |
| 32 | Champagne Moutard | 0% | 0/36 | 69/100 | Good |
| 33 | Champagne Olivier Rousseaux | 0% | 0/36 | 71/100 | Good |
| 34 | Champagne Gaston Collard | 0% | 0/36 | 82/100 | Excellent |
| 35 | CHAMPAGNE DELOUVIN BAGNOST | 0% | 0/36 | 53/100 | Moderate |
| 36 | Champagne Bacchus | 0% | 0/36 | 70/100 | Good |
| 37 | Champagne A. Lété | 0% | 0/36 | 65/100 | Good |
| 38 | Champagne Yveline Prat | 0% | 0/36 | 53/100 | Moderate |
| 39 | Champagne Guy Charbaut à Mareuil | 0% | 0/36 | 1/100 | Critical |
| 40 | Champagne Savoir | 0% | 0/36 | 53/100 | Moderate |
| 41 | Champagne Deneufchatel | 0% | 0/36 | 55/100 | Moderate |
| 42 | Champagne Guy BRUNOT | 0% | 0/36 | 48/100 | Moderate |
| 43 | Champagne Louis Brochet | 0% | 0/36 | 58/100 | Moderate |
| 44 | Champagne LE MESNIL Grand Cru | 0% | 0/36 | 27/100 | Poor |
| 45 | Champagne PANNIER | 0% | 0/36 | 52/100 | Moderate |
| 46 | Viticulteur champagne à Tours sur Marne | 0% | 0/36 | 53/100 | Moderate |
| 47 | Champagne Monmarthe | 0% | 0/36 | 67/100 | Good |
| 48 | Champagne Vadin Plateau | 0% | 0/36 | 68/100 | Good |
| 49 | Champagne A. Robert | 0% | 0/36 | 1/100 | Critical |
| 50 | Champagne Pierre Domi | 0% | 0/36 | 65/100 | Good |
| 51 | Coopérative Viticulteurs Avize | 0% | 0/36 | 58/100 | Moderate |
| 52 | Champagne Launois | 0% | 0/36 | 51/100 | Moderate |
| 53 | Champagne Prévoteau | 0% | 0/36 | 48/100 | Moderate |
| 54 | Champagne G. Tribaut | 0% | 0/36 | 66/100 | Good |
| 55 | Champagne Hélène Beaugrand | 0% | 0/36 | 46/100 | Moderate |
| 56 | Champagne Gérard Loriot à FESTIGNY | 0% | 0/36 | 56/100 | Moderate |
| 57 | Champagne Urbain Père | 0% | 0/36 | 70/100 | Good |
| 58 | Champagne J. Pérard Père et Fils | 0% | 0/36 | 62/100 | Good |
| 59 | Champagne Collet | 0% | 0/36 | 1/100 | Critical |
| 60 | Champagne Gruet | 0% | 0/36 | 40/100 | Moderate |
AIRI rating by score: Excellent from 80, Good 60–79, Moderate 40–59, Poor 20–39, Critical below 20.
What the AIRI dimensions show
| AIRI dimension | Panel avg. |
|---|---|
| LLM instructions (llms.txt) | 11/100 |
| Structured data | 37/100 |
| Freshness | 54/100 |
| Technical basis | 71/100 |
| Content quality | 72/100 |
| Brand clarity | 78/100 |
| Crawlability | 81/100 |
| AI crawler access (robots.txt) | 83/100 |
Three findings
1. Fame decides, not the website. Champagne Bollinger leads on 36% with an AIRI of 52/100. What AI recommends here is what books, press and guides say about the region — and those have been the same names for decades.
2. This measurement asks the hardest question — it is a floor, not a forecast. Champagne JP Gaudinat scores 88/100 on AIRI, better than any named house, and appears in no answer at all. So a good score is not a magic number. Generic questions ("which Champagne estates should I know?") are a fame contest, and it is won by whoever has been in the books and guides for decades.
That is where your own website counts: not to become famous, but to be found on the question someone with an intent to buy actually asks. Machine readability is necessary for that and not sufficient — the page also has to answer the question. The region averages 61/100: soundly built, but without the signals an AI draws citable facts from.
3. 56 estates do not exist for AI. That is not a judgement of quality, it is a gap in the data. Someone wanting to buy Champagne wine who asks ChatGPT gets a handful of names and never learns the other 56 exist.
Where does your winery stand?
We measure your AI visibility with the same method — free, with real answers as evidence and your country’s industry average for comparison.
Request the free report (worth CHF 20)